Posted by NCWayne on October 31, 2009 at 18:53:19 from (173.188.168.35):
I read a small article in yesterdays copy of USA today about this lawsuit so I looked it up when I got home. (reading the article in the link this isn"t the only case like this either ) Who comes up with crap like this? In the USA Today article the lawyer for the plaintiff was claiming that the aluminium bat was "defective" because it could "hit a ball with so much power that it couldn"t be seen in flight". While I feel sorry for the kid that died and his family but what kind of country do we live in where a mfg can be sued for something like this.
Given the thinking I guess I ought to become a professional whistler and then eat alot of crackers right before a major contest with a HUGE payout to the winner. When I lost I could sue the cracker mfg for not providing a warning that the eating crackers might possibly dry my mouth out enough that it would prevent me from whisteling, thereby winning the $500000 prize, unless I drank x amount of liquid first.........Ridicilous I know but given the current thinking (or lack there of) in this country who can guarantee it won"t ever got that far.
Heck those of you farming out there don"t forget to put a warning on everything you grow. You know for a fact that it might possibly cause choking if not properly prepared, chewed, or whatever.......
Sadly where do we place the real blame here for such a frivilous lawsuit? Do we place it with a distraught family who is simply looking for someone to justify, or maybe just blame, for their son"s death, is it on the lawyer who put the idea in their head that they had a chance to win something like this, or in the end is it on the jury that found no fault with the product yet still said the mfg owed the family nearly a million dollars because their bat hit a ball that hit their son? Heck, why not sue the mfg of the ball for making it too hard? Why can"t all balls be made out of Nerf material...?
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Harvestin Hay: The Early Years (Part 2) - by Pat Browning. The summer of 1950 was the start of a new era in farming for our family. I was thirteen, and Kathy (my oldest sister) was seven. At this age, I believed tractor farming was the only way, hot stuff -- and given a chance I probably would have used the tractor, Dad's first, a 1936 Model "A" John Deere, to go bring in the cows! And I think Dad was ready for some automation too. And so it was that we acquired a good, used J. I. Case, wire tie hay baler. In addition to a person to drive th
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
