Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Tariff War Question ...


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by oldtanker on September 19, 2018 at 08:20:25 from (66.228.255.59):

In Reply to: Tariff War Question ... posted by Crazy Horse on September 19, 2018 at 07:45:37:

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

OK, I'll take a stab at this.

1: "the other guy responds with an equal amount of tariff and things continue back and forth." That's how it should work. What has happened is that one country will say, like they US charge 5% and the other other country will charge 25% on US goods creating a trade imbalance.

2: Sure a country can win this when they buy enough of another country's GDP that an embargo can create an economic problem for the selling country.

This current problem has been ongoing for years. Politicians from all sides are afraid to address situations like this. This fear proves that any politician regardless of affiliation won't force an issue even thought they may have made promises and or sworn and oath. They don't make waves because reelection is more important than doing their job. Folks have been yelling about about trade imbalances for decades. They yelled real loud when the Carter/Reagan recession started. A good example was Japan in that time frame. They were not only subsidizing manufactured goods so that they could sell stuff to us, they were charging on some thing 3 or 4 times for tariffs for similar US made goods. Especially cars. Politicians on both side were screaming about that situation. None of them were willing to do anything to fix it.

So what's happening is that a guy got elected who isn't a career politician. One who isn't afraid to tackle this problem. Now the same countries that have been causing this trade imbalance have to deal with the president trying to fix this problem. Short term some people are going to feel the effects. So without being emotional someone has to pay that price. Do we do this where 10, 20 maybe even 30% of the population is directly effected? Or do we do this where maybe 2% (farmers) are the ones most effected? We are not using our assets to feed ourselves with about 41% of the corn and over 50% of beans going into our gas tanks. So (I know I'm being harsh) we can loose 40% of our farmers and still feed just as many people. That 40% is less than 1% of the total US population. Simply put? GMO's and Roundup are killing farmer. No, not with cancer. But by increasing production enough that if "renewable" fuel production was to stop we can just do away with 40% of the farmers.

Rick


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - New Life for an Old Allis - by Tyler Woods. My friend Jon, has an old '39 Allis Chalmers B. He thought it a marginal tractor that had long since served its time. She smoked terribly and never had much power but he couldn't afford another so he was limping along with what he had. Jon's Allis has a small front loader and though it doesn't carry much, it serves his needs. It was the hard starting and low power that made him think it was time to replace the old girl. Jon called me to help him discover why his tractor wouldn't start ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy